• Welcome to Escort Access

    EA is a private hobbyist forum system with hobbyists and providers. You can purchase a Premium membership and this gives you access to view all private threads, replies and full access.
evie chriatian interview

Providers offering BBFS without tests?

Sexaddict

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Registered
Premium
I’ve hooked up with a provider who offered BBFS without requiring any negative test from me. It cost an extra $100, and based on the reviews, it seems she offers this to everyone.

I understand there’s a debate about whether BBFS with a provider could be physically harmful, but I think there are two perspectives to consider here.

First, let me explain why I think going bareback with a provider who doesn’t require a negative test might be alright.

1. The girl takes several penicillin shots before each session to protect herself—and her clients—from diseases.

2. Most providers are aware that being careless could have serious consequences for them. If they get infected with anything, they might be unable to work for weeks or even months.

On the other hand, what speaks against going bareback is that these girls—who often have regular clients—might see 8-9 guys a day, and they can’t realistically inspect each and every one of them.

The girl I did this with went by the stage name Barbie. She charged $100 for BBFS. I asked her about it in the middle of the session, threw the money on the table, took off my condom, and continued.

Having sex without a condom is SO much better than with one.

Now, would you—or have you—had BBFS with a provider who didn’t require a valid test?
 
Back
Top