I’ve spent a limited amount of time on OF, none of which was during its infancy (ie, before the proliferation of chatters), so perhaps I’m missing some key context, but I don’t see how the content creators could be absolved of all blame for actions they themselves have taken (hiring chatters, claiming old content is new, not fulfilling orders), while conversely, OF could be fully to blame for actions taken by third parties (the creators and chatters) solely because (a) they didn’t anticipate at launch that not every interaction on the platform would come from the creators themselves (a lack of foresight and imagination certainly, but not a reason for them to bear all blame) and (b) once the existence/usage of chatters became clear to them, they didn’t act to shut them down completely (virtually impossible to do, I’d suspect) or didn’t change their ToS soon enough (an accurate complaint from what I’ve read, but again, not something that would fully absolve the creators IMO).
I’m no lawyer and don’t play one on TV so I don’t know all the legalese and while I’m involved it’s more a class action type thing where I'm one of like dozens or more and I kinda just sit back and wait to hear from lawyers about what they need from me.
When I say I don’t blame the models/creators that’s just me personally. Whether they’ll be in some sort of legal trouble I am not sure but I doubt it.
At the end of the day, at least when it comes to chatters, yes they did stuff against the rules… but it’s onlyfans that let them do it. They knowingly let them violate the terms of service, didn’t suspend the accounts and continued to say in the terms that customers were speaking to the models themselves.
As I said before, this could have been avoided if 1) once they knew about the issue they changed the terms and acknowledged it or 2) suspended all models clearly doing it due to a violation and thus removed them from the platform.
The models/content creators broke the rules of the platform but that isn't necessarily illegal. It's the business/platform that promised something and failed to live up to that promise (false advertising in a sense I suppose).
I'd also point out that every site has a set of rules people must comply with or they face a ban or suspension or something else. If the company lets content remain up that shouldn't cause it violates the rules, the company is then at fault I believe.
