ShroomsQ has come up a small amount in the community. @martymcfly1955 brought her up before I did, showing that we share the same affinity for petite providers—and you can’t get much smaller than Shrooms. Other than that, it doesn’t take much to see what makes Shrooms worth at least looking into to see what comes of it. Then you find something like what you see below that hits you right in the chest, bringing on the realization that seeing Shrooms might not be possible—ever.
As you can see, the caption says it all. It’s safe to say this could just be Shrooms talking, but even if it’s bullshit, there’s still a little truth in what she’s saying. Pointing out the good first—Shrooms is thinking about providing, if she isn’t already. The last part reading “even then I’d have to think about it” could mean we’ll see Shrooms on someone’s roster by next year. I’m sure it’ll be either on PCs or Lourdes, so this is something to look forward to and keep an eye on. Then there’s the rest of the post.
“$1k baby more like $100k” was the part I was referring to. Even though there’s no way Shrooms would be given a rate of $1,000, the exaggeration of going up to $100k ties into the delusion that some providers have when they believe their rates should be higher than they realistically are. A lot of women fall into that mindset until someone brings them back to reality—that their rate doesn’t quite fit them. There are a lot of ways to speculate what a provider’s rate should be, and I’m not going to go into that right now, but we all know there are variables that tell you what the rate shouldn’t be just as much as what it should. I’m sure one of the providers here will go into detail about what I mean, and by all means, I welcome it.
With what we know about Shrooms now, this post pretty much paints her in the light we were having a hard time seeing before. Rumors have circulated that Shrooms can be a little difficult in certain situations. We don’t know for sure if those rumors are true, though this post isn’t helping.
Bottom line—if or when Shrooms decides to start providing, someone’s going to have to TOFTTM. I wouldn’t mind doing it, because Shrooms is exactly the type I’m looking to cross off my list. Good or bad experience, she could still be worth seeing.
As you can see, the caption says it all. It’s safe to say this could just be Shrooms talking, but even if it’s bullshit, there’s still a little truth in what she’s saying. Pointing out the good first—Shrooms is thinking about providing, if she isn’t already. The last part reading “even then I’d have to think about it” could mean we’ll see Shrooms on someone’s roster by next year. I’m sure it’ll be either on PCs or Lourdes, so this is something to look forward to and keep an eye on. Then there’s the rest of the post.“$1k baby more like $100k” was the part I was referring to. Even though there’s no way Shrooms would be given a rate of $1,000, the exaggeration of going up to $100k ties into the delusion that some providers have when they believe their rates should be higher than they realistically are. A lot of women fall into that mindset until someone brings them back to reality—that their rate doesn’t quite fit them. There are a lot of ways to speculate what a provider’s rate should be, and I’m not going to go into that right now, but we all know there are variables that tell you what the rate shouldn’t be just as much as what it should. I’m sure one of the providers here will go into detail about what I mean, and by all means, I welcome it.
With what we know about Shrooms now, this post pretty much paints her in the light we were having a hard time seeing before. Rumors have circulated that Shrooms can be a little difficult in certain situations. We don’t know for sure if those rumors are true, though this post isn’t helping.
Bottom line—if or when Shrooms decides to start providing, someone’s going to have to TOFTTM. I wouldn’t mind doing it, because Shrooms is exactly the type I’m looking to cross off my list. Good or bad experience, she could still be worth seeing.
